<p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">長洲居民郭卓堅申請司法覆核，指政改諮詢過程出錯，導致諮詢報告及特首提交人大常委的政改報告未如實反映香港情况，要求煞停政改進程。高等法院昨頒判辭拒絕受理，指議題純屬「學術討論」，無實質效用。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">郭卓堅早前入稟要求推翻該兩份於去年7月15日發表的報告，人大則於8月31日發表決議，訂下特首選舉框架，該方案於上周四被立法會否決。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-weight: bold; font-size: 12pt;">官：純學術討論 無實質效用</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0000pt; margin-right:0.0000pt; margin-bottom:0.0000pt; margin-left:0.0000pt; text-indent:0.0000pt; layout-grid-mode:char; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-justify:inter-ideograph; "> </p><p><span style="font-family: Arial; letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt;">法官區慶祥在判辭指法庭不會審理並非最終或重大的決定；人大常委收到報告，公布「8．31框架」，僅牽涉政改五部曲的首兩階段；法庭亦不能覆核人大常委決定，此案議題流於學術討論，法庭不會受理。郭一方稱，法庭可藉本案發出指導，供今後的公共諮詢參考，但未獲區官接納。區官認為每次公共諮詢性質迥異，就此案的事實提出指引，對其他諮詢過程無實際作用。他亦不會因郭延遲申請覆核，而按緊急情况受理此案。</span></p>