學者估計 政治考慮為主

<p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">長實與和黃重組後,新創立的長和集團,不再以香港作為註冊地,而是轉移到開曼群島,變相遷冊。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">雖然長實主席李嘉誠昨天再三否認遷冊,但有學者認為,相比公司財務或稅務上的考慮,香港的政治風險增加及法治制度的不明朗因素,才是李嘉誠轉移註冊地的主因;從法律角度看,將來公司若捲入訴訟,本港法庭或許對長和沒有司法權。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; ">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">據長實副董事總經理葉德銓昨天解畫,根據現行香港法例,只有可分配儲備(Distributable&nbsp;Reserve)才可向股東分派,以出售屈臣氏25%股權為例,雖然令和黃的股東權益增加390億元,但由於並無反映在損益表之上,技術上不被視作可分配儲備,以致創造了的價值不能分派給股東;另外,權益會計法(Equity&nbsp;Accounting)下,來自聯營公司的留存利潤(Retained&nbsp;Earnings)亦不能用作分派,但開曼群島的法例則無此限。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; ">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-weight: bold; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">英法院擁官司終審權</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; ">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">中大酒店及旅遊管理學院高級講師李兆波則表示,若純粹為方便向股東分派股息,尚有其他可行辦法,不一定要轉移註冊地。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; ">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">李兆波認為,根據李嘉誠一向深思熟慮的營商作風,相信他是考慮到香港近年政治氣候變化大、政治角力壁壘分明,加上本身年事已高,有必要及早為其龐大的集團業務分散風險。</span></p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt ; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric; text-autospace:ideograph-other; layout-grid-mode:char; vertical-align:; ">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">有法律界人士指出,開曼群島為英屬領土,在當地註冊的長和日後若面對官司,最終審核權將是英國最高法院而非香港終審法院。</span></p>


Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /home/chinai11/public_html/wp-content/plugins/custom-author/custom-author.php on line 91
发布于要闻